tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-328010919691635719.post8895727740019962721..comments2007-09-13T13:35:52.202+02:00Comments on Eamon Nerbonne: Automatic Properties in C# 3.0 - sweet!Eamon Nerbonnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00388124191987595398noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-328010919691635719.post-77234383862666813652007-01-07T16:25:00.000+01:002007-01-07T16:25:00.000+01:00Well I guess that resolves thomas's objection then...Well I guess that resolves thomas's objection then.Eamon Nerbonnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00388124191987595398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-328010919691635719.post-29155199830042048452007-01-07T05:41:00.000+01:002007-01-07T05:41:00.000+01:00The syntax is not the same because "abstract" keyw...The syntax is not the same because "abstract" keyword is needed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-328010919691635719.post-38685952601460716612006-11-23T17:21:00.000+01:002006-11-23T17:21:00.000+01:00That's a good point, but I'm happy that they have ...That's a good point, but I'm happy that they have anything like this at all - constantly managing boilerplate code is not my idea of fun.Eamon Nerbonnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00388124191987595398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-328010919691635719.post-52782492812825304702006-11-23T16:51:00.000+01:002006-11-23T16:51:00.000+01:00But... the syntax you give is the same as the synt...But... the syntax you give is the same as the syntax for an abstract property. In C# 2.0, you can write this in an abstract class to indicate: "derived classes must have a property Name with a getter and a setter". So another syntax would be desirable.Thomashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02609144861191873031noreply@blogger.com